Monday, October 28, 2013

Hawaiian Hands in Hawaiian Lands: The Exploitation of Ea, Lāhui, and its Nation

                The illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian government continues to leave Kanaka Maoli vulnerable and highly contentious against the white man and his search for power in his quest of colonial imperialism. An anti-annexation petition was sent from the people of Hawaii with 37,000 signatures out of a 40,000 member Native Hawaiian population, calling for the restoration of the monarchy. The Committee of Safety and other businessmen with monopolies in the sugar industry continued with aggressive measures to push for annexation. Settlers in the Hawaiian Islands seek to impose federal regulations on the Kanaka Maoli, retain the lands of the indigenous people, and fail to recognize their illegal acts of occupying the nation. The simultaneous oppression of Kanaka Maoli and the exploitation of their culture lead to the call for the reinstatement of power to the lāhui of the kingdom.  
         In the mid to late 1830s, a phenomenon called Pacific Imperialism took over the world. Dominating countries, such as Great Britain, America, and France took over lands in the Pacific claiming them as their own. Kauikeaouli (Kamehameha III) was concerned as to how Hawai’i would protect itself due to lack of military and modern weapons. Histories have said that Hawai’i would be a constitutional monarchy that would be imposed by missionaries, who sought to have a conversion to Western culture, which was proven false. He decided to turn to a Western style of government (constitutional monarchy) for sovereignty and protection, becoming the first non-Western nation to gain sovereignty, in which Kanaka Maoli participated in their government. He created a constitution for the kingdom of Hawai’i, developed the Anglo-Franco Proclamation in 1843, and sixteen countries began to recognize Hawai’i’s sovereignty.
            Kauikeaouli created the privatization of lands, advised by missionary descendants who sought to monopolize the sugar industry and appeal to the United States for a possible move to annexation. The Hawaiian genealogy laid out in the chant of the Kumulipo stated that land was the elder sibling and a resource of all people living in the ahupua’a (district), so the idea of capitalism was foreign to Hawaiians. In the 1840s, Kauikeaouli believed that land titles and ownership would allow the land to be kept by its people, should any foreign power question or attempt to take the land of their own. The Māhele was developed as the private ownership and division of land. A board was commissioned and created for land titles and is mostly comprised missionaries or descendants of missionaries who saw capitalist opportunities here in Hawaiʻi. If one owned a parcel of land, the owner had two years to claim the land so that the board could give them a deed. The land had to be surveyed (many farmers and natives did not know of surveys) and landowners paid a computation fee.
The king, government, and people all have interests in the land. One could get rid of this fee by deciding to pay fee simple. Native Hawaiians were displaced from this proportioning of the land. Out of 88,000 Native Hawaiians in 1848, 14,195 claims are made. Only 8,421 awards, so 9% of Native Hawaiians are awarded land through the Māhele. There are about 4.2 million acres of land in Hawaiʻi. The Māhele divides the lands of Hawaiʻi into Crown lands, government lands, and private lands and 1.3 million acres of land was set aside for private lands by the commission. Out of these 1.3 million acres, 28,658 acres of land, or 2.2% of the lands, were awarded to Kanaka Maoli. Land corporations and conglomerates that were created by the members of the commission bought a vast majority of these lands. Over the next forty years, a new system of competition and capitalism is established. These corporations displaced the landowners, disregarded the Natives’ titles, and Kanaka Maoli began to sell their land.
The lands bought were used for a sugar trade industry. During the time of the Civil War, the North was cut off from their sugar, which was supplied by the South. The United States offers the Reciprocity Treaty, which guaranteed a duty-free market for Hawaiian sugar in exchange for special economic privileges for the United States that were denied to other countries. Once the Civil War ended, the Reciprocity Treaty also came to an end and sugar company executives were worried about maintaining their exponential growth. Their solution was to continue the United States tax-free goods for the use of Pu’uloa (Pearl Harbor) for a military station. In 1877, King David Kalakaua was forced to sign the Bayonet Constitution that stripped rights away from the monarch, added strict voting requirements, and gave power to the elite businessmen. These businessmen, in power, eventually pushed for annexation to ensure their economic prosperity with the assistance of US Ambassador to the islands John Stevens to overthrow Queen Lili’uokalani on January 19, 1893.
The revolution that overthrew the monarchy was illegal and the ensuing Republic of Hawaii was not internationally recognized as a nation. Therefore, they had no right to offer a treaty of annexation including the ceding of Hawaiʻiʻs public lands to the United States. It is against international law to land foreign troops in another nation without the request of the reining ruler of that kingdom. There was never a treaty of annexation adopted by the US Senate, which would have required a 2/3 votes, which was not attained due to Southern statesʻ sugar production competition and the opposition to gaining more minority citizens (Kanaka Maoli and Asians). Kanaka Maoli submitted 37,000 signatures on a petition opposing annexation, also swaying some important votes in the Senate. There never was a treaty of annexation ratified by the U.S. Senate. A joint resolution is not valid because it cannot extend beyond the borders of the U.S. Because Hawai’i was not a part of the U.S. at the time, any measure of joint resolution could not be effective in the kingdom.
My Lego protestor represents the illegal history of America and its imperialism in Hawaii. Currently, there is a move for federal recognition in the Akaka Bill, which would label Native Hawaiians as American Indians and allow the federal government continued control of the lands that they illegally occupy. Instead of land-owning businesses to be involved, there is a call for more “Hawaiian hands” or Kanaka Maoli to be involved in promoting the use of cultural regeneration in their “Hawaiian lands”.  America needs to take responsibility by allowing a passage of power back to the restoration of the Hawaiian nation. As Foucault would state, power needs to be rightfully exchanged, as it is not effective in a heirarchy. Machiavelli also states that an effective leadership would not take the peopleʻs land (property) or women. This stripping away of land from the Kanaka Maoli also speaks to a theoretical political violation in the United Statesʻ use in political power.
The protestor also challenges the issue of cultural exploitation. Tourism is the biggest industry that brings in economic growth for Hawaiʻi. With tourism comes the concept of cultural exploitation in the utopia presented as “paradise”. There are images of hula girls, tiki ornaments, and white, sandy beaches, with no knowledge or stories to educate the people about our rich history. The protestorʻs hula costume represents two aspects. One is the negative commercialization of Hawaiian culture in the tacky costume. The second aspect is that hula and mele (song) were known as forms of Native Hawaiian resistance. These forms of entertainment would express opposition to the governmentʻs doings. Hula was prohibited by the missionaries and Hawaiian laaguage was banned from all schools starting in 1896, restricting the voice of the people. There is a call for the United States to rectify the wrong and recognize their occupation of the Hawaiian nation. There is a cultural responsibility to the land, the indigenous peoples’ ancestor. Instead of allowing state or federal control over these lands, there is a solution to allow the lāhui, or the nation of the Kanaka Maoli, to regain lands that were previously taken away to restore cultural value to the land, using these sites for Kanaka Maoli agriculture, education, and various other social services. The restoration of sites and culture is a form of sovereignty to honor and respect the culture of the Kanaka Oiwi.
Lego Figure

No comments:

Post a Comment